A lifestyle intervention or metformin prevented or delayed the onset of the metabolic syndrome in persons at riskPDF
ACP J Club. 2005 Nov-Dec;143:67. doi:10.7326/ACPJC-2005-143-3-067
Clinical Impact Ratings
Orchard TJ, Temprosa M, Goldberg R, et al. The effect of metformin and intensive lifestyle intervention on the metabolic syndrome: the Diabetes Prevention Program randomized trial. Ann Intern Med. 2005;142:611-9. [PubMed ID: 15838067]
In persons with impaired glucose tolerance, does an intensive lifestyle intervention (ILS) or treatment with metformin plus standard lifestyle recommendations prevent onset or promote resolution of the metabolic syndrome?
Design: Randomized placebo-controlled trial (The Diabetes Prevention Program randomised trial).
Blinding: Blinded (clinicians, participants, data collectors, and outcome assessors for metformin and placebo).*
Follow-up period: Mean 3.2 years.
Setting: 27 centers in the United States.
Participants: 3234 participants ≥ 25 years of age (mean age 51 y, 68% women) without diabetes who had a body mass index ≥ 24 kg/m2 (≥ 22 kg/m2 for Asian Americans) and a plasma glucose level 5.3 to 7.0 mmol/L (95 to 125 mg/dL) (≤ 7.0 mmol/L ≤ 125 mg/dL] for Native Americans) in the fasting state and 7.8 to 11.1 mmol/L (140 to 199 mg/dL) after a 75-g oral glucose load. Exclusion criteria included recent myocardial infarction and use of medications known to impair glucose tolerance. 53% of participants had the metabolic syndrome at baseline.
Intervention: ILS (n = 1079; 530 without the metabolic syndrome), standard lifestyle recommendations plus glucose control with metformin (850 mg twice daily) (n = 1073; 503 without the metabolic syndrome), or placebo (n = 1082; 490 without the metabolic syndrome). The ILS aimed at achieving and maintaining weight reduction ≥ 7% of initial body weight through a low-calorie, low-fat diet and moderate physical activity. Standard lifestyle recommendations emphasized the importance of reducing weight and increasing physical activity.
Outcomes: Incidence and resolution of the metabolic syndrome (defined as having ≥ 3 characteristics [waist circumference; blood pressure; and levels of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, triglycerides, and fasting plasma glucose] that met the criteria of the National Cholesterol Education Program Adult Treatment Panel III [NCEP III]).
Patient follow-up: 100% (intention-to-treat analyses).
The cumulative incidence of the metabolic syndrome was lower in the ILS and metformin groups than in the placebo group (Table). Furthermore, the cumulative incidence was lower in the ILS group than in the metformin group (Table). Resolution of the metabolic syndrome was greater in the ILS group than in the placebo group (38% vs 18%, P = 0.002); metformin and placebo groups did not differ for resolution (23% vs 18%, P > 0.05).
In persons with impaired glucose tolerance, an intensive lifestyle intervention or treatment with metformin plus standard lifestyle recommendations was more effective than standard lifestyle recommendations alone for preventing or delaying onset of the metabolic syndrome. Also, the intensive lifestyle intervention was more effective than metformin for preventing the metabolic syndrome.
Source of funding: National Institutes of Health.
For correspondence: Diabetes Prevention Program Coordinating Center, George Washington University, Rockville, MD, USA.
Table. Intensive lifestyle intervention (ILS) or metformin plus standard lifestyle vs placebo plus standard lifestyle for prevention of the metabolic syndrome at mean 3.2 years†
|Outcome||Comparisons||Cumulative incidence||RHR (95% CI)||NNT (CI)‡|
|Incidence of metabolic syndrome||ILS vs placebo||38% vs 61%||41% (28 to 52)||4 (3 to 7)|
|Metformin vs placebo||50% vs 61%||17% (0 to 31)||9 (5 to 41)|
|ILS vs metformin||38% vs 50%||29% (13 to 42)||9 (5 to 33)|
†RHR = relative hazard reduction. Other abbreviations defined in Glossary.
‡NNTs provided by author.
The Diabetes Prevention Research Group previously reported in a separate analysis that both ILS and metformin were effective in reducing risk for progression to type 2 diabetes, with ILS being approximately twice as effective as metformin (1). The metabolic syndrome, as defined by NCEP III, represents a cluster of cardiovascular risk factors that are associated with excess visceral abdominal fat and insulin resistance. Much of the excessive cardiovascular risk associated with impaired glucose tolerance is explained by concomitant presence of the metabolic syndrome. The trial by Orchard and colleagues found that the results for incidence of the metabolic syndrome paralleled those for new-onset diabetes, with ILS being more effective than metformin, which in turn was more effective than placebo. ILS reduced cumulative incidence of 4 out of the 5 metabolic syndrome components (i.e., all except low high-density lipoprotein [HDL] cholesterol level), while metformin only reduced the cumulative incidence of 2: large waist circumference and high fasting plasma glucose levels. The relatively modest targeted weight loss (7% of initial body weight) and amount and intensity of exercise (target 150 min/wk) with ILS might explain why HDL cholesterol was not affected; greater volume and intensity of exercise are probably needed to increase HDL cholesterol (2).
Nevertheless, this trial provides additional evidence for the value of an individualized, structured, supervised ILS to reduce incidence of multiple cardiovascular risk factors that collectively constitute the metabolic syndrome.
Ronald J. Sigal, MD, MPH, FRCPC
Ottawa Health Research Institute and University of Ottawa
Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
1. Knowler WC, Barrett-Connor E, Fowler SE, et al. Reduction in the incidence of type 2 diabetes with lifestyle intervention or metformin. N Engl J Med. 2002;346:393-403. [PubMed ID: 11832527]
2. Kraus WE, Houmard JA, Duscha BD, et al. Effects of the amount and intensity of exercise on plasma lipoproteins. N Engl J Med. 2002;347:1483-92. [PubMed ID: 12421890]